Manohla dargis biography of donald
A prescient 2020 documentary about how Donald Trump won the 2016 Presidential election reveals some of the underlying factors in the electorate that allowed him to win again in 2024. Click for Amazon w/trailer.
Most of the films about or involving Trump – now likely a couple hundred or more — are documentaries, and a few are made-for-TV docu-dramas or theatrical release.
As will be shown below, some planned biopics on Trump date to the late 1980s, though not always completed in a timely fashion due to litigation or other problems.
But most of the long-form film productions, with Trump as film star and/or principal subject – apart from early TV interviews, talk shows, and news clips – those began in the early-to-mid 2000s, in the wake of his rise in national notice, first as TV star on The Apprentice (noted in the first selection below), and later with his subsequent presidential bids.
The listing that follows here is a partial sampling of those films, including some of the more probing and critical documentaries produced by A&E’s Biography series, the History Channel, CNN, the BBC, PBS Frontline, and others, each with dates, brief descriptions, commentary, or reviews — some with excerpts or summaries from Amazon, Wikipedia, IMDB, and others.
Many of the films listed here are also available in DVD format and/or via streaming, some with free trailers. A number of images or links in this story connect to Amazon pages.
The Apprentice TV shows, in various formats and sometimes with two “seasons” per year, ran for nearly 15 years, with Donald Trump as host for 11 of those years.
2004-2007
The Apprentice
Probably no other filming entity did more to burnish the image of Donald Tr Issue 23 Manohla Dargis began writing for The Village Voice in 1987: like J. Hoberman, her initial field of concentration was the avant-garde. In 1994, she moved across the country, becoming the editor of the L.A. Weekly film section the following year. Expanding its film coverage, she always maintained a dedication to genuinely independent and foreign (her 1999 Top 10 list begins with a tirade against critics who write about the supposed death of world cinema) films. Within the past few months, she’s moved to a daily paper, the L.A. Times, which has given her a surprising amount of space to write about films like In Praise of Love (Jean-Luc Godard, 2001) and Manoel de Oliveira’s I’m Going Home (2001). Additionally, the BFI is publishing her monograph on L.A. Confidential (Curtis Hanson, 1997) next spring. Her current film reviews for the L.A. Times, can be viewed here. – SE * * * Steve Erickson: Had you done much film criticism before entering The Village Voice? If so, where? Manohla Dargis: The Village Voice was the first place I published. I was in graduate school, studying for a Masters in Cinema Studies at New York University, when I began writing for the film section in 1988. I had taken a criticism class with Jim Hoberman (one of the other students, by the way, was critic Chuck Stephens), specifically in order to take a writing course. As far as I remember, Jim’s was the only writing class the department offered the entire time I was in the department. I was having a tough time finishing my final papers and thought it would be good discipline to take a class in which I would be forced to write on a weekly basis. As it turned out, the course was one of the best I took at NYU, as well as one of the most important. SE: When you started there your ‘beat’ was the avant-garde. At present, the paper devotes little space to this area. Do you still follow it much For instance, Weber was one of the industry’s first female directors and a big name at the time, but has now faded from general film history. She tackled issues ranging from child labor to prostitution. Shoes follows the story of a young woman struggling to support her sisters and parents as a store clerk, and unable to afford a new pair of shoes. “It’s exciting to show a 1916 movie, and especially with so much discussion around female directors,” says Dargis. “The fight for female directors goes on, but there’s a history. Women made movies at the beginning of cinema.” Ford’s 1941 working-class opus How Green Was My Valley, about 19th century Welsh coal miners, snagged Ford a best director Oscar. “Watching the film, we discuss, ‘What’s an auteur?’” says Dargis, referencing auteurism, which views a director as the main creative force of a movie. Filmed for less than $10,000 over a series of weekends, Burnett’s 1977 gritty and humorous black-and-white drama Killer of Sheep—his MFA thesis film at UCLA—follows a disillusioned husband and father who works in a slaughterhouse in Watts. The movie is a realistic bird’s eye view into African-American Southern California experience, shot by a black director. With the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements raising the bar when it comes to women being treated fairly, and growing attention on boosting overall equity, diversity and inclusion in television and film, the need for a variety of filmmaker voices is essential. According to a 2018 USC report examining 1,100 popular films from 2007 through 2017, only 4 percent of the films’ directors were women, and only 5 percent were black or African-American. “I want a diversity of voices, stories and styles because it’s better for the art form, and part of that diversity is ra It’s too bad that in making its first movie based on a Marvel comic Disney didn’t decide to take a real leap into the future, say, by making Hiro a girl… — Manohla Dargis, The New York Times Dear Ms. Dargis, I was born in Vietnam shortly before the tanks rolled into Saigon and my family was forced to flee. Raised in South Minneapolis’ largest, poorest, and most racially diverse neighborhood, my father taught me to walk to the library and got me hooked on free books. Later, I would learn to run there, mostly to avoid the myriad groups of bullies wanting to beat me for whatever reason they could conjure that day, and I would read books and comics to take me far away from who I was and where I was. It is safe to say that the majority of my boyhood was spent imagining that I was anything but who I was. Perseus, Launcelot, Spider-Man, Superman, Wolverine, Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, Captain Kirk, Aragorn, Flash Gordon, Bilbo Baggins — yes, they are all men. But what else do they have in common? In my dreams I was always a white hero, because that was what I was taught to believe heroes looked like. Even the weird cartoon I loved from Japan — an animated space soap opera called Robotech — featured a main character, Rick Hunter, that I thought was white. It wasn’t until I was an adult that I found out his name in Japan was Hikaru Ichijyo. Remember also that the 80s was a special time: “Buy American” was all the rage, most of that patriotic fervor directed against Asians, even Asian Americans, as if all of us were getting checks from the Japanese auto industry (we weren’t — and the American auto industry was really the one screwing over workers by building plants in other countries ). My people in particular were the target of a very special xenophobic hatred: people on the street would shout at us and other Asians on the street, blaming us for the Vietnam War and the deaths of their relatives, not knowing that people Interview with Manohla Dargis
NY TIMES FILM CRITIC MANOHLA DARGIS TEACHES STUDENTS TO THINK CRITICALLY ABOUT MOVIES